I actually read the 2 dkim headers as the first being a validation of the SMTP 
from the 2nd as a validation of the body-from.
I would rather have the dkim on the body-from (visible to user) than on the 
SMTP from.

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Terry Zink [mailto:tz...@exchange.microsoft.com] 
Sendt: 21. september 2016 20:01
Til: Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it>; Povl Hessellund Pedersen 
<povl.hessellund.peder...@dsg.dk>
Emne: RE: [dmarc-discuss] A bit quiet?

That's an Office 365 stamp. The second "dkim=pass" is redundant (it's a bug I 
am trying to have fixed). The ungarbled form below is correct (minus the second 
DKIM result).

-----Original Message-----
From: dmarc-discuss [mailto:dmarc-discuss-boun...@dmarc.org] On Behalf Of 
Alessandro Vesely via dmarc-discuss
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 12:48 AM
To: Povl Hessellund Pedersen <povl.hessellund.peder...@dsg.dk>
Cc: dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
Subject: Re: [dmarc-discuss] A bit quiet?

On Tue 20/Sep/2016 08:44:00 +0200 Povl Hessellund Pedersen wrote:
>
> Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.214.50) 
> smtp.mailfrom=my.test.dk; dsg.dk; dkim=pass (signature was verified) 
> header.d=my.test.dk;dsg.dk; dmarc=pass action=none 
> header.from=my.test.dk;dsg.dk; dkim=pass (signature was verified) 
> header.d=my.test.dk;

Just curious how that resulted from the ungarbled form, which I guess was:

Authentication-Results: dsg.dk;
  spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.214.50) smtp.mailfrom=my.test.dk;
  dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=my.test.dk;
  dmarc=pass action=none header.from=my.test.dk;
  dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=my.test.dk;

Ale
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dmarc.org%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2fdmarc-discuss&data=02%7c01%7ctzink%40exchange.microsoft.com%7c0dba28d0105b40f688ca08d3e1f46bbf%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1%7c0%7c636100412304871716&sdata=zTd294kX4%2fldnZXoGzHDBgl%2fk0JKevWVBTJldVNeYuI%3d

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dmarc.org%2fnote_well.html&data=02%7c01%7ctzink%40exchange.microsoft.com%7c0dba28d0105b40f688ca08d3e1f46bbf%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1%7c0%7c636100412304871716&sdata=026Ary8v%2bu4ikcPDcTIZnbxeVAuy0CsSiTjMkkeCbY0%3d)

_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

Reply via email to