I actually read the 2 dkim headers as the first being a validation of the SMTP from the 2nd as a validation of the body-from. I would rather have the dkim on the body-from (visible to user) than on the SMTP from.
-----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Terry Zink [mailto:tz...@exchange.microsoft.com] Sendt: 21. september 2016 20:01 Til: Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it>; Povl Hessellund Pedersen <povl.hessellund.peder...@dsg.dk> Emne: RE: [dmarc-discuss] A bit quiet? That's an Office 365 stamp. The second "dkim=pass" is redundant (it's a bug I am trying to have fixed). The ungarbled form below is correct (minus the second DKIM result). -----Original Message----- From: dmarc-discuss [mailto:dmarc-discuss-boun...@dmarc.org] On Behalf Of Alessandro Vesely via dmarc-discuss Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 12:48 AM To: Povl Hessellund Pedersen <povl.hessellund.peder...@dsg.dk> Cc: dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org Subject: Re: [dmarc-discuss] A bit quiet? On Tue 20/Sep/2016 08:44:00 +0200 Povl Hessellund Pedersen wrote: > > Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.214.50) > smtp.mailfrom=my.test.dk; dsg.dk; dkim=pass (signature was verified) > header.d=my.test.dk;dsg.dk; dmarc=pass action=none > header.from=my.test.dk;dsg.dk; dkim=pass (signature was verified) > header.d=my.test.dk; Just curious how that resulted from the ungarbled form, which I guess was: Authentication-Results: dsg.dk; spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.214.50) smtp.mailfrom=my.test.dk; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=my.test.dk; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=my.test.dk; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=my.test.dk; Ale _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dmarc.org%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2fdmarc-discuss&data=02%7c01%7ctzink%40exchange.microsoft.com%7c0dba28d0105b40f688ca08d3e1f46bbf%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1%7c0%7c636100412304871716&sdata=zTd294kX4%2fldnZXoGzHDBgl%2fk0JKevWVBTJldVNeYuI%3d NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dmarc.org%2fnote_well.html&data=02%7c01%7ctzink%40exchange.microsoft.com%7c0dba28d0105b40f688ca08d3e1f46bbf%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1%7c0%7c636100412304871716&sdata=026Ary8v%2bu4ikcPDcTIZnbxeVAuy0CsSiTjMkkeCbY0%3d) _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)