I agree with John Payne on this one. Their implementation shouldn't work this way based on the default settings.
Regards, Al Iverson -- Al Iverson www.aliverson.com (312)725-0130 On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Payne, John via dmarc-discuss <dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote: > >> On Nov 14, 2016, at 9:49 AM, Petr Novák via dmarc-discuss >> <dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I saw that FortiNet's FortiMail is listed as a product that has a DMARC >> support here: "https://dmarc.org/resources/products-and-services/" . >> >> I wonder what do you guys think about it's DMARC implementation. If you >> enable DMARC check in FortiMail it rejects(or performs other configured >> action) any mail that fails DMARC check no matter what policy source domain >> has configured. So it also rejects mails from domains that have policy >> p=none. After contacting their support I was told that this implementation >> is by desing and they dont have any plans to change it. >> >> In DMARC RFC there is: >> "To enable Domain Owners to receive DMARC feedback without impacting >> existing mail processing, discovered policies of "p=none" SHOULD NOT modify >> existing mail disposition processing." >> >> So I guess it doesn't break RFC if there is "SHOULD NOT" and not "MUST NOT"? >> But I still think this implementation of DMARC is wrong. What do you guys >> think? > > > Speaking only as an enterprise trying to use DMARC, FortiMail’s > implementation as described above is wrong and serves only to discourage > others from implementing a DMARC policy. p=none is vital. > > That said, I would have no objection to fortimail customers having the option > to treat p=none as p=quarantine or p=reject -> that’s completely up to them. > But by default no thank you! > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc-discuss mailing list > dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org > http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > > NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms > (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)