On Monday, April 21, 2014 9:01 PM, "dmarc-requ...@ietf.org" <dmarc-requ...@ietf.org> wrote:
>> That doesn't seem to me like a shocking level of trust. > Yes indeed, but then, the recent breaches shows too much trust > has been sprinkled all around. Many ESP will provide you with > dedicated IPs for your sends, this allows you to control your > deliverability, the email security, etc... They come at a price, > but you have what you pay for. should i read this as: if u want DMARC 3rd party support, please pay? maybe we should then just forget about making DMARC an open standard, instead just paying for proprietary solutions in the same area. that's about much better security overall. faulty thinking, if u ask me. i have no problem with making a standard as flexible as possible and let the domain owners' decide what and how much security they like. introducing authorised alignment doesn't essentially break DMARC. it just makes it more natural to email today and also adds support for things we, obviously, need and use. -- Vlatko Salaj aka goodone http://goodone.tk _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
