Here's a draft that puts the forwarding thing into DKIM, with the dread version bump. It defines a general syntax for conditional signatures, with the forwarding signature the only condition defined so far. (Since you asked, new conditions don't need another version bump.)
R's, John ----------------------------------------------------------------- A new version of I-D, draft-levine-dkim-conditional-00.txt has been successfully submitted by John Levine and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-levine-dkim-conditional Revision: 00 Title: DKIM Conditional Signatures Document date: 2014-06-16 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 5 URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-levine-dkim-conditional-00.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-levine-dkim-conditional/ Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-levine-dkim-conditional-00 Abstract: The DKIM protocol applies a cryptographic signature to an e-mail message. This specification extends DKIM to allow the specification of external conditions that must be satisfied for a signature to be valid. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
