On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Tim Draegen <t...@eudaemon.net> wrote:
> Simply put, the public suffix concept is useful beyond what DMARC requires > of it. The best that DMARC can do (as a piece of technology) is fully > articulate 1 specific use case for the public suffix concept, and hope that > other use cases get fleshed out enough so that a viable solution can be > crafted by something other than this WG. > There's also a mailing list where this is being discussed (dbo...@ietf.org) as a thing independent of DMARC, and it was the subject of a BoF in Atlanta (I believe) and at least a couple of APPSAWG presentations in the past, so I expect it will get its own Working Group once there's critical mass and a problem statement. This WG should adjust (or be able to adjust) to use whatever that group produces, but not go further than that. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
