> > On Oct 29, 2014, at 7:20 PM, Hector Santos <hsan...@isdg.net> wrote: > > > > If they are going to rewrite, then at the very least we MUST make 3rd party > > protocol options and algorithms available as well to ALL implementators as > > part of the DMARC protocol to complete the total picture.
> Hi Hector, this thread is no longer productive to the work that this working > group needs to immediately accomplish. What you're referring to is more > properly part of a latter phase/milestone, but first the WG needs to finish > compiling the actual list of "indirect email flows". > The WG is focused now on compiling this list to avoid issues that arise when > the problem space is too narrowly defined. Unfortunately this means you need > to wait for the WG to catch up to you. To make sure the WG isn't delayed, > I'm asking for reviews of the current work: > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/dmarc/trac/wiki/MilestoneOneWiki > Anything else right now is simply a distraction. > 1/2 of the WG Chair, +1 from the other 1/2. Ned _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
