On Tuesday, March 24, 2015 7:02 PM [GMT+1=CET], Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > From-munging is hardly open-and-shut "philosophically legitimate." It > has its advocates, but it sucks for many users because of the way > their MUAs handle it, it arguably violates RFC 5322, and is ugly to > boot.
Well, it seems to me the above paragraph could also be written like this: MLM taking ownership of the Header-From (a.k.a. "From-munging" in your terms) has its detractors, but it works fine for many users who don't have a problem with it, arguably conforms to RFC 5322, and looks just nice. > Bottom line: making indirect mail flows compatible with DMARC-style > spoof-protection is a hard problem. It's only a hard problem if mailing list operators insist on clinging to their old-style habits (mailing lists users largely either don't care or don't understand the difference; and any other indirect email flows --apart from mailing lists-- are extremely legacy and obsolete). Regards, J.Gomez _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
