----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael Jack Assels" <mjass...@encs.concordia.ca> > To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superu...@gmail.com> > Cc: dmarc@ietf.org, "J. Gomez" <jgo...@seryrich.com> > Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 4:12:13 PM > Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Next steps for RFC 7489 (DMARC) > > On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 15:23:08 PDT, > "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 1:21 PM, J. Gomez <jgo...@seryrich.com> wrote: > > > > That's not to say that DMARC should change anything about itself. It's > just recognition that making it a great success will depend on someone > finding a way to let mailing lists collaborate with DMARC without > alienating their list users, owners or managers. >
You can't please everyone at the moment, and there are solutions to please various subsets of your lists. I'm on various mailings lists, some friendly to DMARC, some not, with email with a domain with p=reject, or not... What I learn for all the combinations: It does not change much, people still ignore my posts :P _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
