Scott Kitterman writes: > 8 bit to 7 bit transformations are also not rare.
In the header? I guess with RFC 6532 that could happen frequently (but those folks are likely to be in trouble with DKIM anyway for the foreseeable future). > > Really, isn't the question whether Yahoo! and AOL are willing to do > > *anything* to mitigate? We need some participation from them or it's > > useless, and if at least one does participate, it's a win. What are > > they willing to think about implementing? > > Depends on who needs to change to mitigate things. To implement any of the "weak signature" variants (see subject), the >From domain has to be involved as sender. That's why I'm asking. > If (as an example only) we decide that From rewriting is the best > (least bad) solution, That's not what this thread is about, and it obviously doesn't need participation from them. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
