On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:31 AM, John Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote:
> The most tedious and unhelpful discussions here have implicitly (or > perhaps explicitly) assumed that receiver nontechnical costs don't > matter, then repeatedly pointed out the true but useless fact that > there are single party mediator changes with trivial technical costs. > Useless because it presumes the non-technical costs of those changes are high?
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
