On 4/16/15 2:26 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > I don't think market share in the abstract is useful for > this discussion. Per my utility analysis, the question is > not percent of market (however that is defined), but > breadth of market scope being sufficient to enable > interoperability when it's needed. I would still > appreciate solution independent discussion of how to do > the utility analysis or I fear we'll continue to just > argue past each other. Dear Scott,
DMARC is leveraging a public-suffix list to reduce overhead. This approach will cause problems if it leaves a gap between the domains provided by a registrar and those listed as part of the public suffix. With the massive amounts of DMARC feedback being generated, perhaps there should be a way to consolidate these domains into some type of list. Of course, I'll suggest a hashed label approach. Can anyone envision some type of community or specialized effort at consolidating this category of the domain space? Regards, Douglas Otis _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
