On 12/1/2017 11:32 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Kurt Andersen (b) <kb...@drkurt.com
<mailto:kb...@drkurt.com>> wrote:
Where would you like to gather such a consensus? Is this DMARC-WG
sufficient or would you want input from a wider community?
Here's fine. Or the ART list, or ietf-822. Or really, anywhere the
IETF considers "on-the-record" in terms of recording consensus.
There really need to be two different questions. The easy one is 'where
should this later assessment be discussed?". Your answer suffices for
that, IMO.
The more-difficult question is what the basis of analysis should be? An
inherent problem with "in this working group" or the like is just how
small a sampling of the email industry it is. It makes it too easy for
the relatively few participants -- even with the best of intentions --
to make highly biases assessments.
So I suggest making a point of soliciting input from various fora, such
as M3AAWG and the range of *NOG groups. Anywhere else?
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
