On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 7:55 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <superu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Dave Crocker <dcroc...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The more-difficult question is what the basis of analysis should be? An >> inherent problem with "in this working group" or the like is just how small >> a sampling of the email industry it is. It makes it too easy for the >> relatively few participants -- even with the best of intentions -- to make >> highly biases assessments. >> >> So I suggest making a point of soliciting input from various fora, such >> as M3AAWG and the range of *NOG groups. Anywhere else? > > > The ones I mentioned as well, and I would say just mentioning once in all > of those places that the discussion is happening in here is sufficient as a > call for participants. If nobody else comes, we know we're the only ones > that really care. > > -MSK > I have just sent out a call for interest to ietf-smtp, art, and copied this group. I also sent it to the technical and collaboration lists @ M3AAWG. --Kurt
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
