Excellent. Then all my comments have been addressed and I have nothing further.
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 2:48 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <superu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 4:56 PM, Seth Blank <s...@sethblank.com> wrote: > >> I've reviewed. All the technical matters look good, and earlier comments >> have all been addressed. I have two final comments: >> >> 1) Section 6.4 mentions changes to section 2.3 which include slightly >> different language than in 7601. I see no difference whatsoever (walking >> back diffs 02-01, 01-00) between the current text in 2.3 and what's in 2.3 >> of 7601. The text is supposed to be loosened so things like smtp.client-ip >> and arc.oldest-pass info for ARC A-R stamps are allowable in the registry. >> > > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-dmarc- > rfc7601bis-01&url2=rfc7601 > > They're inverted (RFC7601 is on the right) but have a look at 2.3. > > 2) Typo: Section 2.2 references "sob-domain" >> > > Fixed in source. > > -MSK > >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
