In article <CAL0qLwZ9x4tZhMFWrCGN4LNxTCHbSDMRJGAECuAJoev7VnGj=a...@mail.gmail.com> you write: >-=-=-=-=-=- >At least 7601bis will be an RFC at the same time as this one is, if not >sooner. I don't know what the plans are for the other one.
Also see Scott's LC comment on 7601bis. There's a bunch of stuff in 7601 not in the new draft, so 7601bis is really an update, not a replacement for 7601. R's, JOhn _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
