On 5 Nov 2018, at 13:46, Barry Leiba <barryle...@computer.org> wrote:
>>>> Both of these are indeed normative in usage, but I was under the >>>> impression that one could not >>>> refer to I-Ds as normative. >>> >>> One can't, so that means that this document will be held by the RFC >>> Editor in a "MISSREF" (missing reference) state until both of the I-D >>> are also in the RFC Editor queue. Then this document will move ahead. >> >> True, but being "afraid of a MISSREF" is not a good enough reason to pretend >> that a Normative >> reference is Informative. > > Of course not, and I didn't mean to imply that it was. I was > explaining that we *can* send the document forward with a missing > normative reference. "We" do not have to wait for it to clear; the > RFC Editor will. Then we are in full agreement. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
