On 5 Nov 2018, at 11:38, Barry Leiba <barryle...@computer.org> wrote:
>> Both of these are indeed normative in usage, but I was under the impression >> that one could not >> refer to I-Ds as normative. > > One can't, so that means that this document will be held by the RFC > Editor in a "MISSREF" (missing reference) state until both of the I-D > are also in the RFC Editor queue. Then this document will move ahead. True, but being "afraid of a MISSREF" is not a good enough reason to pretend that a Normative reference is Informative. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
