Stated Very elegantly Murray. On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 1:36 PM Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 1:20 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <superu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 3:53 PM Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> wrote: >> >>> >>> > and maybe it can solve the "PSL problem" if we can constrain the >>> problem >>> > space to just the DMARC issues instead of recreating the >>> > DBOUND-solve-for-all morass. >>> >>> This problem is simpler than DBOUND. Looking up text policies is common >>> to a >>> handful of protocols. A careful wording might make some statements >>> reusable in >>> general, even if the focus is kept on DMARC. >>> >> >> Sure, the DMARC case is half of what DBOUND tried to tackle. If DBOUND >> had focused just on the DMARC use case, it would've succeeded. >> >> If possible, we should be careful to create a solution that's extensible >> to other use cases, not exclusive of them. Reviewing what DBOUND tried to >> do might be very instructive here. >> >> -MSK >> _______________________________________________ >> dmarc mailing list >> dmarc@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc >> >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
