In article <20181109135829.horde.kt-9atgfd77p2otpu6pn...@andreasschulze.de>,
A. Schulze  <s...@andreasschulze.de> wrote:
>       When evaluating "www.foo.example.com", the first query would be to
>       "www.foo.example._bound.com".  If the reply to this is "BOUND 0 0
>       com", then the second query would go to
>       "www.foo._bound.example.com".
>
>I ask myself if DNS query minimisation could be contrary to the query  
>sequence for subdomains.
>QNAME minimization is normally performed by recursive resolvers. So it  
>should not disturb.
>But for cases where an application implement that logic it would be  
>good to point to RFC 7616.

I worry that if we try to enumerate every possible dumb way someone might
implement even a very simple design, we will end up with a very very very
long document.

R's,
John

-- 
Regards,
John Levine, jo...@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to