On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 8:28 AM Scott Kitterman <skl...@kitterman.com> wrote:
> > Since I'm most familiar with RFC 7208, I took a more detailed look at the > SPF updates. Much of the current text is a restatement of what RFC 7208 > says. I don't know that we need that. The difference is to make explicit > what was already implicit; s and l macros will never match if the local > part of the email address contains non-ascii characters. > Why not? If the non-ASCII (or non-7bit) characters are puny-coded, it seems like they should be able to match without any problems. --Kurt
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
