On April 8, 2019 11:08:30 PM UTC, "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kb...@drkurt.com> wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 3:55 PM Douglas E. Foster <
>fost...@bayviewphysicians.com> wrote:
>
>> I don't know how to express my shock at today's conversations. One
>of
>> the shocks comes from this:
>>
>> We have consensus that the better email filters do not need the DMARC
>for
>> PSDs standard, because they are already blocking non-existent
>domains.
>>
>
>This neglects the benefit to the domain operators of receiving the
>reports
>about abuse of their domain space. For the end recipient of the bogus
>traffic, there is no difference.
>
>
>> The inferior email filters are not expected to implement this
>feature,
>> because they are inferior products.
>>
>
>Somewhat tautological, but most likely true.
>
>
>> Therefore the new standard has no expected benefit, but we need to
>finish
>> it anyway.
>>
>
>Incorrect - see my first point.
The entire thing is further premised on the false premise that because two
small mail operators find one filtering technique appropriate for their
situation and scale, anyone that has a different design is inferior.
Scott K
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
