What part of that do you need an explanation for? It seems pretty clear to me. If you disagree with the statement then you should explain the rationale for your disagreement.
Michael Hammer On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 6:55 PM Douglas E. Foster < fost...@bayviewphysicians.com> wrote: > I don't know how to express my shock at today's conversations. One of > the shocks comes from this: > > We have consensus that the better email filters do not need the DMARC for > PSDs standard, because they are already blocking non-existent domains. > The inferior email filters are not expected to implement this feature, > because they are inferior products. Therefore the new standard has no > expected benefit, but we need to finish it anyway. > > Please explain. > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > dmarc@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
