On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 3:48 PM Jeremy Harris <j...@wizmail.org> wrote:

> On 05/07/2020 23:39, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> > Any opinion on the whole thing generally?
>
> Certainly worthy of discussion.  I wonder if it needs tying
> to ARC rather than, or in addition to DKIM?
>

I think it solves the same problem ARC does.  You want to know what
authentication was possible at the time the MLM received the message; ARC
transmits that information downstream using cryptographic signatures, while
this lets the verifier see for itself.

I originally floated this idea years before ARC was proposed, but there was
no apparent community interest in pursuing it so I let it expire.

-MSK
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to