On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 1:34 AM Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> wrote:
> On Tue 18/Aug/2020 01:21:33 +0200 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > The industry in general, and the IETF in particular, have chosen not > > to pursue widespread use of any kind of standards-based third party > > domain signature policy or reputation system. . . > > > Both ATPS (individual submission, experimental, February 2012) and the > > REPUTE series of documents (working group, standards track, late 2013) > > saw nearly zero adoption after publication even when free reference > > implementations were provided. They differ from basic DKIM in that > > they require non-trivial upkeep, and that appears to be a step > > function inhibiting adoption among operators. > > We can still try again. In particular, the non-trivial upkeep seems > to be a valid diagnosis. > Is there anything which has materially changed between 2012-13 and 2020 which would indicate that the anticipated results for such effort would be any different? --Kurt
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
