On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 10:11 AM Kurt Andersen (b) <kb...@drkurt.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 1:34 AM Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> wrote: > >> On Tue 18/Aug/2020 01:21:33 +0200 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >> > The industry in general, and the IETF in particular, have chosen not >> > to pursue widespread use of any kind of standards-based third party >> > domain signature policy or reputation system. . . >> >> > Both ATPS (individual submission, experimental, February 2012) and the >> > REPUTE series of documents (working group, standards track, late 2013) >> > saw nearly zero adoption after publication even when free reference >> > implementations were provided. They differ from basic DKIM in that >> > they require non-trivial upkeep, and that appears to be a step >> > function inhibiting adoption among operators. >> >> We can still try again. In particular, the non-trivial upkeep seems >> to be a valid diagnosis. >> > > Is there anything which has materially changed between 2012-13 and 2020 > which would indicate that the anticipated results for such effort would be > any different? > +1. If anyone has some kind of creativity in this space that they've been hiding, now's the time. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
