On 17 Nov 2020, at 11:35, Dave Crocker wrote:
On 11/16/2020 10:46 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
I'm discussing this with the chairs and they or I will get back to
you shortly.
Forgive me, but this is all a bit nuts.
Very few days before the scheduled session, we get a query about
canceling it, though the query also included a fresh, 'lightweight'
agenda.
A couple of responses are posted, stating a preference for
cancellation, with no immediate responses choosing having the meeting
(though today, some have).
We are now less than 12 hours from the scheduled time and still have
not received a definitive decision by the chairs.
+1. Given the amount of activity on the mailing list, it seemed obvious
to me that we would benefit from some higher-bandwidth interaction. But
apparently that’s less obvious to others.
If the meeting is held, I will be there (since it’s 9-11 pm here in
California), but understand if we don’t want to keep others up for a
less than fully productive meeting.
-Jim
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
