Dave It's the latter. Alexey and I are quite fine with running the meeting, that was part of our conversation.
tim On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 3:23 PM Dave Crocker <d...@dcrocker.net> wrote: > On 11/13/2020 10:40 AM, Tim Wicinski wrote: > > During the chairs call this morning we were discussing the upcoming > > meeting. Now Seth has a conflict with the meeting time that can't be > > altered. Since work items have been progressing rather well recently, > > and the editors are in positing, we discussed canceling the meeting. We > > wanted to get some feedback from the working group. > > > > Here is a lightweight agenda Seth put together. Should we 1) have a > > meeting around these topics; 2) discuss other topics or 3) cancel the > > meeting and keep moving along. > > > Four days before a scheduled, rare meeting, it's being canceled because > one of its 3 chairs can't attend? > > Or because it has suddenly been realized that the meeting won't be useful? > > Really? > > d/ > -- > Dave Crocker > Brandenburg InternetWorking > bbiw.net >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
