In article <553d43c8d961c14bb27c614ac48fc0312811f...@umechpa7d.easf.csd.disa.mil> you write: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >Even for .mil, the vast majority of email domains are fairly short with four >or fewer labels. Most of the other ones tend to be >individual servers that send automatic performance emails, and I think should >be considered more of an edge case and less of our concern.
I scraped my logs for the past few months and that's what I found. Nearly everything was four labels or less. Spot checking the few five-label names, I found that most of the mail was all from MAILER-DAEMON@<long-mailhost-name> and it appeared to be spam blowback. There was a trickle of what looked like real mail from stumail.zcs.k12.in.us and feedback.retail.voice-your-views.hsbc.com, I found nothing at all with six labels or longer. So if we made the tree walk limit six or seven I think we'd be unlikely to lose any mail that anyone would miss. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
