On 2020-12-21 18:27, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
On Mon 21/Dec/2020 01:52:11 +0100 Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2020-12-20 23:07, Michael Thomas wrote:
On 12/20/20 2:01 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
For the message I'm replying to, I got:
Authentication-Results: wmail.tana.it;
spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ietf.org;
dkim=pass reason="Original-From: transformed" (whitelisted)
header.d=junc.eu;
dkim=pass (whitelisted) header.d=ietf.org
header.b=GUNfiCpP;
dkim=fail (signature verification failed, whitelisted)
header.d=ietf.org
header.b=IIMQxhd+
Two out of three is not bad, is it? If IETF only did ARC seals, I'd
probably verified no signature at all —since I don't run ARC checks.
metacpan Mail::DKIM gives dkim invalid if just one dkim is invalid, so
spamassassin says aswell dkim invalid
what software used above to show this results ?
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
