On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 7:23 AM <ned+dm...@mrochek.com> wrote: > P.S. I hadn't looked at RFC 6589 before, and I have to say I find its > standards-track status to be nothing short of astonishing. How on earth do > you > assess interoperability? >
With the benefit of hindsight, that's a great question. I'd have been happy with Informational. Indeed, the IESG evaluation record shows several ADs brought that up, but none of them insisted, and thus it didn't get changed. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
