In article <CAL0qLwaZx97cztehz_o=ccvzrbep_yfvs9htqwdkg7cmgjn...@mail.gmail.com> you write: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >How are implementers dealing with forensic report loops? > >Say I send a message from X to Y, whose DKIM signature fails. Y sends me >back a forensic report, whose DKIM signature also fails. X sends a >forensic report to Y, whose report fails, etc. We need a way to break the >loop.
If the reports are unaligned and their domain is requesting failure reports, sending reports about the failure is exactly the right thing to do. I still don't understand why anyone thinks there is a problem to be fixed. If you don't want reports, don't ask for them. If you think the mail you send shouldn't be provoking DMARC failure reports, adjust whatever is sending the mail the mail is aligned, or get rid of the ruf= that asks for the reports. What am I missing here? _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
