It appears that Scott Kitterman <skl...@kitterman.com> said: >4. Common parent domain not marked PSD. We could add a new tag to the DMARC >records for PSDs to indicate it's a PSD, so it's record shouldn't be used for >alignment. Getting this added to the literal handful of PSD records that >exist and specifying it should be used going forward is doable. To implement >this approach should produce identical (modulo PSL errors and omissions) >results to the RFC 7489 approach. It seems like we've decided to trust that >ICANN and ccTLD operators will effectively manage publication of PSL records >for policy discovery, so this leverages that trust to simplify alignment while >maintaining backward compatibility.
This is a much better worked out version of my DNS tree climbing proposal. I like it too. R's, John PS: Just out of nosiness, what PSD records exist now? _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
