Sigh... On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 2:50 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <superu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The status we're going for is "Proposed Standard". Note the word > "Proposed"; a document seeking this status doesn't need to be bulletproof > out the door, as some evolution based on experience is required. The > standard for publication is higher than Experimental or Informational, to > be sure, but it's not so high that leaving room for development isn't > permitted. If the things you're calling "experimental" here are based on > consensus after the working group is clearly making informed decisions, I > think we're good to go. We're not trying to leap directly to "Internet > Standard". > Make that: "... as some evolution based on experience is anticipated." -MSK, same hat
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
