It appears that Murray S. Kucherawy <superu...@gmail.com> said: >The status we're going for is "Proposed Standard". Note the word >"Proposed"; a document seeking this status doesn't need to be bulletproof ...
I would expect a great deal of institutional pushback at a change directly from informational to full standard even if we didn't change a thing. So Proposed Standard it is. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
