On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 7:49 AM Scott Kitterman <skl...@kitterman.com>
wrote:

> Given that the mechanism we've defined uses DMARC records to make the
> determination, I don't think it would be useful to separate it into a
> different document.  If we ever get an approach that's not DMARC specific,
> then I think it would make sense to document it independently.
>

The tree walk might be the DBOUND solution, for all we know.  Having it in
a separate, generic-as-possible, document might make the technique usable
by other applications as well.

I rather liked the idea of DMARCbis saying "You need some way to determine
the Organizational Domain.  One way is with the PSL as described in X, or
you could do a tree walk as described in Y."  It also means if we ever want
to introduce some third mechanism, we don't need to do a DMARCbisbis (which
I think is DMARCter).

-MSK
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to