On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 11:10 AM John Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote:
> That seems like a pessimal way to make things interoperate: use one of > an unknown set of algorithms and the other party can't tell which one > you're going to use. If we can't agree that the tree walk is better > than piggybacking on the PSL, I don't see any of the other changes > we're proposing to be worth the effort to republish so we should stop > now and not waste more time. > Given that we're already working in an environment where it's unlikely that everyone's working from a common version of the PSL, I don't think this is such a scary idea. I didn't actually make the claim that the tree walk is better or worse, by the way. There are ways to say things like "you could use the PSL, but it's deprecated for X reasons" in the model I proposed. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
