It appears that Douglas Foster  <dougfoster.emailstanda...@gmail.com> said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Maybe the problem is that John has trademarked "weak" to mean "L=0", so I
>will use "poorly constructed".  ...

Sorry, no.  Once again, you appear to have completely misunderstood my
old double signing proposal.

Nobody uses weak signatures, and even if they did. redesigning DKIM is 
stupendously
out of scope for this WG.

R's,
John

_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to