> If we use SHOULD NOT, as you suggest, there's an implication that there might > be a valid reason for > non-transactional mail to use "p=reject". Are we okay with that?
I, for one, am not. We often use "SHOULD NOT" incorrectly to mean "MUST NOT, but we know it will be widely violated so we're saying SHOULD NOT". We need to stop doing that. Barry _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
