I've thought about this a bit more; I could get behind "<general purpose> domains MUST NOT publish p=reject" (for interoperability) as long as it is made clear the interoperability context for the "MUST NOT" does not address the perceived security benefits of its current usage by domain owners at large.

As said in your original message that started this topic, "... no one will be arrested or fined for choosing not to follow the [MUST NOT]", but then I feel like we still have an impasse, because it's not much of a standard if nobody adheres to said standard (as others have stated on-list), especially so in this case of strict language. The recommendation I feel from the community would probably still be, "have p=reject as a goal" even with this language in place.

Possibly off-topic slightly, I think BIMI's requirement for DMARC is contradictory to what this language is trying to portray for the standard. We'd publish "general purpose domains must not publish p=reject" for DMARCbis, but then one of the pre-requisites of BIMI is to at least have p=quarantine, which still does damage due to the non-standardized way disparate receivers handle the policy. Point is, it seems conflicting to have two documents telling (and expecting) domain owners to do different things.

- Mark Alley

On 4/9/2023 1:33 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
> As Todd previously stated, my preference is for language that
> acknowledges the primacy of the domain owner over interoperability

The problem is that IETF standards are about interoperability, not about anyone’s primacy.

There is an alternative, though: we can acknowledge that because of how those deploying DMARC view their needs over interoperability, DMARC is not appropriate as an IETF standard, and we abandon the effort to make it Proposed Standard.

I see that as the only way forward if we cannot address the damage that improperly deployed DMARC policies do to mailing lists.

Barry


_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to