Ok, everyone, let’s take a rest here. First: John’s message was not nice. We can all agree on that. So…
(1) John, please don’t send messages like that, even off list. You can clearly see why that’s good advice. (2) Everyone other than John, please just accept John’s word — I do — that sending it to the list was accidental, and that he did not mean to publicly disparage or embarrass anyone. What happened is regrettable. Let’s be bigger than the error and get past it. Thanks. Second: this whole thread is well beyond the scope of what the working group is chartered to do. I’ve let these sorts of discussions go because I hoped they might lead us in a useful direction. It’s become very clear that they will not, and that they are just distractions that prevent us from resolving the issues at hand and finishing the chartered work. So… (1) Please stop this and related threads, and please avoid discussions that are not in direct resolution of open issues. (2) Be aware that the chairs will be getting aggressive about shutting down out-of-scope discussions quickly. I will put the mailing list on moderation if necessary, which would mean that every post would need approval before it’s posted to the list. I’d rather not spend my time that way; please don’t make it necessary. Barry, as chair
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
