On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 2:40 PM Ken Simpson <ksimp...@mailchannels.com> wrote:
> FWIW, I'd like to chuck my hat in the ring on the side of removing SPF > from the next iteration of DMARC. As the operator of an email delivery > service with tens of millions of primarily uncontrolled senders on web > hosting servers, it would be *great* if domain owners could assert via > their DMARC record that receivers should only trust DKIM-signed email. > Can these senders not accomplish the same thing by removing the SPF record altogether? -MSK, participating
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
