> For clarity: When you say, "AD will call consensus on this issue", you mean > after the results of the discussion > are brought to the list and reviewed by the working group, not at the > meeting, right?
Yes, correct. I wanted to make it clear that Seth and I both have a conflict on this, and neither of us can be the one calling consensus. (I honestly think that either of us would actually do it fairly, but we really do need to stay away from that...) > Also, I expect to have a proposal on protocol reliability related to the > "drop SPF" discussion, in the next day or three. Excellent; thanks! Barry _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc