Fine with me, just wanted to ask the question. -MSK, hatless
On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 1:48 PM Barry Leiba <barryle...@computer.org> wrote: > Indeed. We can do what we've done in other cases: create a registry > if/when we add something else later. > > Barry > > On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 4:11 PM Scott Kitterman <skl...@kitterman.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > On August 7, 2023 7:47:03 PM UTC, "Murray S. Kucherawy" < > superu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >On Sat, Aug 5, 2023 at 1:09 PM Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> Based on the ABNF in -28, how about something like this: > > >> > > >> > > >> dmarc-method = "dkim" / "spf" > > >> > > >> dmarc-auth = "auth" equals dmarc-method *(*WSP "," *WSP dmarc-method) > > >> > > >> > > >> I think this "should"(*) allow for all permutations but also > simplifies > > >> it, and I agree with Barry it should be simpler. > > >> > > > > > >This looks good to me, except to be consistent with DKIM (from which > this > > >general syntax was borrowed) I'd suggest: > > > > > >* using colon as the separator rather than comma > > >* WSP and CFWS should follow whatever we did for other tags > > >* don't allow an empty list; I can't think of any DKIM or DMARC tag that > > >accepts a list and also allows an empty value > > > > > >If we think we might add "arc" or something else in the future, do we > need > > >a registry of supported methods? If not, we'll have to rev DMARC every > > >time a new one comes into favor. > > > > I think we don't need a registry. Rationale: > > > > 1. There is no additional method that's being contemplated (whatever > ARC is, it's not a first class alternative to SPF or DKIM). > > > > 2. Currently, we have text in the specification to describe how to use > the output of SPF and DKIM for DMARC. I don't think there's much prospect > any new method wouldn't need something similar. > > > > I think a registry would only complicate things and wouldn't actually be > helpful. > > > > Scott K > > > > _______________________________________________ > > dmarc mailing list > > dmarc@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > dmarc@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
