> Error reports are a different class than failure errors Indeed, I was referencing those ones.
> Did any mail operator actually sends error reports I had access to multiple reports (~40K). I have seen a lot of aggregate, some forensic/failures (very rare), but no error reports. Regards, Olivier De: "Matthäus Wander" <mail=40wander.scie...@dmarc.ietf.org> À: "dmarc" <dmarc@ietf.org> Envoyé: Mercredi 1 Novembre 2023 19:13:02 Objet: Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC policy discovery and invalid tag exception. Steven M Jones wrote on 2023-11-01 10:46: > On 10/25/23 4:25 AM, Matthäus Wander wrote: >> Olivier Hureau wrote on 2023-10-25 12:56: >>> What about using the error report of RFC 7489 for this purpose >>> instead of aggregate report? ( >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7489#section-7.2.2 ) [...] > Failure reports were actually sent for many years, and not just by small > operators - NetEase and Hotmail were sending them between 2013 and 2018. > And the reports had real value, even when heavily redacted. Error reports are a different class than failure errors. Did any mail operator actually send error reports as per RFC 7489 Section 7.2.2? Regards, Matt _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
