Is there a point to this thread, that affects the text in the DMARCbis
document under charter criteria?

Seth, as Chair

-mobile


On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 07:13 Douglas Foster <
dougfoster.emailstanda...@gmail.com> wrote:

> RFC 7489 and DMARCbis are written as algorithms without exception
> conditions.  That silence leads product developers and mail administrators
> to conclude that the algorithm can be implemented without allowing for
> exceptions.   Why would we expect a different result?
>
> Withheld information can deceive.
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023, 5:14 AM Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> wrote:
>
>> On Wed 22/Nov/2023 00:51:24 +0100 Jim Fenton wrote:
>> > I see that the DMARC marketing machine is hard at work. There was an
>> item on NPR (National Public Radio) “All Things Considered” this afternoon
>> heavily promoting DMARC:
>> >
>> >
>> https://www-cf.npr.org/2023/11/21/1214529474/how-to-keep-an-eye-out-for-cyber-scams-during-this-holiday-shopping-season
>> >
>> > I have strong feelings about this article that are off-topic for this
>> mailing list.
>>
>>
>> What is not off-topic is the consideration that such sentiment implies
>> that a
>> prohibitive statement would turn out to mean /MUST NOT use mailing lists/.
>>
>>
>> Best
>> Ale
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmarc mailing list
>> dmarc@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to