Is there a point to this thread, that affects the text in the DMARCbis document under charter criteria?
Seth, as Chair -mobile On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 07:13 Douglas Foster < dougfoster.emailstanda...@gmail.com> wrote: > RFC 7489 and DMARCbis are written as algorithms without exception > conditions. That silence leads product developers and mail administrators > to conclude that the algorithm can be implemented without allowing for > exceptions. Why would we expect a different result? > > Withheld information can deceive. > > > > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2023, 5:14 AM Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> wrote: > >> On Wed 22/Nov/2023 00:51:24 +0100 Jim Fenton wrote: >> > I see that the DMARC marketing machine is hard at work. There was an >> item on NPR (National Public Radio) “All Things Considered” this afternoon >> heavily promoting DMARC: >> > >> > >> https://www-cf.npr.org/2023/11/21/1214529474/how-to-keep-an-eye-out-for-cyber-scams-during-this-holiday-shopping-season >> > >> > I have strong feelings about this article that are off-topic for this >> mailing list. >> >> >> What is not off-topic is the consideration that such sentiment implies >> that a >> prohibitive statement would turn out to mean /MUST NOT use mailing lists/. >> >> >> Best >> Ale >> -- >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dmarc mailing list >> dmarc@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc >> > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > dmarc@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
