On March 5, 2024 2:47:47 PM UTC, Todd Herr <todd.herr=40valimail....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: >On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 6:12 AM Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Section 5.3, in the format description of psd: >> >> n: The DMARC policy record is published for a PSD, but it is the >> Organizational Domain for itself and its subdomain. There is >> no need to put psd=n in a DMARC record, except in the very >> unusual case of a parent PSD publishing a DMARC record without >> the requisite psd=y tag. >> >> Perhaps a "not" is missing between "is" and "published"? I'd just say >> the >> domain is not a PSD /and/ it is the Organizational Domain for itself and >> its subdomain. >> >> >You may be correct in your assertion here; I'll wait for others to weigh in. > >In the meantime, Issue 126 has been opened to track this. >
I think it's missing a not, but is overwise fine. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
