Messages by Date
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7489 (7835)
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Appendix B.2.3. Per-Message Failure Reports Directed to Third Party
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nit: Appendix B.1, examples parallelism and typo
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Section 9.5 DMARC Report Format Registry
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nit: missing angle brackets
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/14
[dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignment
Douglas Foster
-
2024/03/13
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignment
Douglas Foster
-
2024/03/13
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignment
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/13
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignment
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/13
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignment
Douglas Foster
-
2024/03/13
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignment
Tobias Herkula
-
2024/03/12
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: The sad state of SPF: research just presented at NDSS
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/03/12
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: The sad state of SPF: research just presented at NDSS
Mark Alley
-
2024/03/12
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: The sad state of SPF: research just presented at NDSS
John Levine
-
2024/03/12
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: The sad state of SPF: research just presented at NDSS
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/03/12
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: Break SPF response: DKIM Only
Douglas Foster
-
2024/03/12
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: The sad state of SPF: research just presented at NDSS
Neil Anuskiewicz
-
2024/03/12
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignment
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2024/03/12
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Inconsistencies in DMARC Aggregate Report XML Schema
Hector Santos
-
2024/03/12
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: Break SPF response: DKIM Only
Neil Anuskiewicz
-
2024/03/12
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Don't trivialize psd=n
Neil Anuskiewicz
-
2024/03/12
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: The sad state of SPF: research just presented at NDSS
Neil Anuskiewicz
-
2024/03/12
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: The sad state of SPF: research just presented at NDSS
Richard Clayton
-
2024/03/12
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: The sad state of SPF: research just presented at NDSS
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/03/12
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: The sad state of SPF: research just presented at NDSS
Dotzero
-
2024/03/12
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignment
Tobias Herkula
-
2024/03/12
[dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignment
Douglas Foster
-
2024/03/12
Re: [dmarc-ietf] A.5 Issues with ADSP in Operation
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/11
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: The sad state of SPF: research just presented at NDSS
Neil Anuskiewicz
-
2024/03/11
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Description of rua and ruf Tags
Neil Anuskiewicz
-
2024/03/11
Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30.txt
Neil Anuskiewicz
-
2024/03/11
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Inconsistencies in DMARC Aggregate Report XML Schema
Neil Anuskiewicz
-
2024/03/11
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Inconsistencies in DMARC Aggregate Report XML Schema
Neil Anuskiewicz
-
2024/03/11
Re: [dmarc-ietf] 4.1 DMARC Basics
Neil Anuskiewicz
-
2024/03/11
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6
Neil Anuskiewicz
-
2024/03/11
Re: [dmarc-ietf] A.5 Issues with ADSP in Operation
Neil Anuskiewicz
-
2024/03/11
Re: [dmarc-ietf] picking nits with the ABNF
Neil Anuskiewicz
-
2024/03/11
[dmarc-ietf] Fwd: [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7489 (7835)
Eliot Lear
-
2024/03/11
Re: [dmarc-ietf] picking nits with the ABNF
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2024/03/10
[dmarc-ietf] Don't trivialize psd=n
Douglas Foster
-
2024/03/10
[dmarc-ietf] Appendix B.2.3. Per-Message Failure Reports Directed to Third Party
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/10
[dmarc-ietf] Nit: Appendix B.1, examples parallelism and typo
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/10
[dmarc-ietf] Messages from the dmarc list for the week ending Sun Mar 10 06:00:04 2024
John Levine
-
2024/03/10
Re: [dmarc-ietf] picking nits with the ABNF
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/09
Re: [dmarc-ietf] picking nits with the ABNF
Tim Wicinski
-
2024/03/09
Re: [dmarc-ietf] picking nits with the ABNF
OLIVIER HUREAU
-
2024/03/09
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Section 9.5 DMARC Report Format Registry
Tim Wicinski
-
2024/03/09
Re: [dmarc-ietf] A.5 Issues with ADSP in Operation
Benny Pedersen
-
2024/03/09
[dmarc-ietf] picking nits with the ABNF
Tim Wicinski
-
2024/03/09
Re: [dmarc-ietf] A.5 Issues with ADSP in Operation
Tim Wicinski
-
2024/03/09
[dmarc-ietf] A.5 Issues with ADSP in Operation
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/09
[dmarc-ietf] Nit: missing angle brackets
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/09
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another point for SPF advice
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/08
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another point for SPF advice
Hector Santos
-
2024/03/08
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Section 9.5 DMARC Report Format Registry
Tim Wicinski
-
2024/03/08
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Section 9.5 DMARC Report Format Registry
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2024/03/08
[dmarc-ietf] SHOULD (was Re: Another point for SPF advice)
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2024/03/08
[dmarc-ietf] Section 9.5 DMARC Report Format Registry
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/08
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/08
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another point for SPF advice
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/08
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/07
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7489 (7835)
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/07
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Clarify When Tree Walk Starts?
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/07
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Clarify When Tree Walk Starts?
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/06
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7489 (7835)
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2024/03/06
[dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Clarify When Tree Walk Starts?
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/06
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7489 (7835)
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/06
[dmarc-ietf] Fwd: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7489 (7835)
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2024/03/06
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Section 11.3
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/06
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/06
Re: [dmarc-ietf] The description of psd=n
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/05
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6
Barry Leiba
-
2024/03/05
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Section 11.3
Barry Leiba
-
2024/03/05
Re: [dmarc-ietf] The description of psd=n
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/03/05
Re: [dmarc-ietf] The description of psd=n
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/05
Re: [dmarc-ietf] The description of psd=n
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/03/05
Re: [dmarc-ietf] A possible point for SPF advice
Richard Clayton
-
2024/03/05
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another point for SPF advice
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/03/05
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another point for SPF advice
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/05
Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5. Domain Owner Actions
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/05
Re: [dmarc-ietf] A possible point for SPF advice
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/03/05
Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5. Domain Owner Actions
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/05
[dmarc-ietf] 5.5. Domain Owner Actions
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/05
Re: [dmarc-ietf] 4.1 DMARC Basics
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/05
Re: [dmarc-ietf] A possible point for SPF advice
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/05
Re: [dmarc-ietf] The description of psd=n
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/05
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another point for SPF advice
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/05
[dmarc-ietf] Another point for SPF advice
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/05
[dmarc-ietf] The description of psd=n
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/04
[dmarc-ietf] Fwd: Break SPF response: DKIM Only
Chuhan Wang
-
2024/03/04
[dmarc-ietf] Fwd: The sad state of SPF: research just presented at NDSS
Chuhan Wang
-
2024/03/04
Re: [dmarc-ietf] The sad state of SPF: research just presented at NDSS
Hector Santos
-
2024/03/04
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6
Hector Santos
-
2024/03/04
[dmarc-ietf] A possible point for SPF advice
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/04
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DISCARD: 4.3. Authentication Mechanisms
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/04
[dmarc-ietf] 4.3. Authentication Mechanisms
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/03
[dmarc-ietf] Messages from the dmarc list for the week ending Sun Mar 3 06:00:04 2024
John Levine
-
2024/03/03
[dmarc-ietf] 4.1 DMARC Basics
vesely
-
2024/03/02
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Description of rua and ruf Tags
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2024/03/02
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Tim Wicinski
-
2024/03/02
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Description of rua and ruf Tags
vesely
-
2024/03/01
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Description of rua and ruf Tags
John R Levine
-
2024/03/01
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Description of rua and ruf Tags
Seth Blank
-
2024/03/01
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Description of rua and ruf Tags
John Levine
-
2024/03/01
[dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Description of rua and ruf Tags
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/01
Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30.txt
vesely
-
2024/03/01
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Section 11.3
Todd Herr
-
2024/02/29
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Section 11.3
John Levine
-
2024/02/29
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Break SPF response: DKIM Only
Douglas Foster
-
2024/02/29
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2024/02/29
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Break SPF response: DKIM Only
Richard Clayton
-
2024/02/29
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6
Seth Blank
-
2024/02/29
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/02/29
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Todd Herr
-
2024/02/29
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6
Seth Blank
-
2024/02/29
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/02/29
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6
Dotzero
-
2024/02/29
[dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Section 11.3
Todd Herr
-
2024/02/29
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6
Mark Alley
-
2024/02/29
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/02/29
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6
Todd Herr
-
2024/02/29
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6
Seth Blank
-
2024/02/29
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/02/29
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6
Todd Herr
-
2024/02/29
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6
John Levine
-
2024/02/29
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/02/29
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6
Seth Blank
-
2024/02/29
[dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6
Todd Herr
-
2024/02/29
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Break SPF response: DKIM Only
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/02/29
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Break SPF response: DKIM Only
Benny Pedersen
-
2024/02/29
Re: [dmarc-ietf] The sad state of SPF: research just presented at NDSS
John Levine
-
2024/02/29
[dmarc-ietf] Break SPF response: DKIM Only
Douglas Foster
-
2024/02/29
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Todd Herr
-
2024/02/29
[dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-14
Barry Leiba
-
2024/02/29
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
OLIVIER HUREAU
-
2024/02/29
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Inconsistencies in DMARC Aggregate Report XML Schema
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/02/29
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Todd Herr
-
2024/02/29
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Inconsistencies in DMARC Aggregate Report XML Schema
Todd Herr
-
2024/02/28
Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-14.txt
Brotman, Alex
-
2024/02/28
[dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-14.txt
internet-drafts
-
2024/02/28
[dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Barry Leiba
-
2024/02/28
[dmarc-ietf] The sad state of SPF: research just presented at NDSS
Barry Leiba
-
2024/02/28
Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30.txt
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/02/28
Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30.txt
Todd Herr
-
2024/02/28
[dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30.txt
internet-drafts
-
2024/02/28
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Inconsistencies in DMARC Aggregate Report XML Schema
Todd Herr
-
2024/02/27
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Inconsistencies in DMARC Aggregate Report XML Schema
Brotman, Alex
-
2024/02/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/02/11
[dmarc-ietf] Messages from the dmarc list for the week ending Sun Feb 11 06:00:04 2024
John Levine
-
2024/02/10
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From
Douglas Foster
-
2024/02/10
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From
Benny Pedersen
-
2024/02/10
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/02/10
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2024/02/10
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From
Jim Fenton
-
2024/02/10
Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc-dmarcbis: add "req=dkim"
Hector Santos
-
2024/02/08
Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc-dmarcbis: add "req=dkim"
Jim Fenton
-
2024/02/08
Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc-dmarcbis: add "req=dkim"
John R. Levine
-
2024/02/08
Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc-dmarcbis: add "req=dkim"
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2024/02/08
Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc-dmarcbis: add "req=dkim"
Todd Herr
-
2024/02/08
Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc-dmarcbis: add "req=dkim"
Jeroen Massar
-
2024/02/07
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/02/06
Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc-dmarcbis: add "req=dkim"
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2024/02/06
Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc-dmarcbis: add "req=dkim"
Todd Herr
-
2024/02/06
Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc-dmarcbis: add "req=dkim"
Jeroen Massar
-
2024/02/06
Re: [dmarc-ietf] dmarc-dmarcbis: add "req=dkim"
John Levine
-
2024/02/06
[dmarc-ietf] dmarc-dmarcbis: add "req=dkim"
Jeroen Massar
-
2024/02/05
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2024/02/05
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2024/02/05
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From
Douglas Foster
-
2024/02/05
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/02/04
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From
John Levine
-
2024/02/04
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2024/02/04
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From
Douglas Foster
-
2024/02/04
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/02/04
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/02/04
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From
Douglas Foster
-
2024/02/03
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2024/02/03
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/02/02
[dmarc-ietf] dmarc - Not having a session at IETF 119
IETF Meeting Session Request Tool
-
2024/01/31
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From
Douglas Foster
-
2024/01/28
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/01/27
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Non-technician's idea for DMARC improvement
Richard Clayton
-
2024/01/27
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Non-technician's idea for DMARC improvement
John Levine
-
2024/01/27
[dmarc-ietf] Non-technician's idea for DMARC improvement
Ted Wham
-
2024/01/27
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/01/27
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From
Douglas Foster
-
2024/01/27
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/01/21
[dmarc-ietf] Messages from the dmarc list for the week ending Sun Jan 21 06:00:04 2024
John Levine
-
2024/01/19
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From
Hector Santos
-
2024/01/19
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From
Seth Blank
-
2024/01/19
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From
Dotzero
-
2024/01/19
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From
Todd Herr
-
2024/01/18
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From
Hector Santos
-
2024/01/18
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From
Emil Gustafsson
-
2024/01/17
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From
Steven M Jones
-
2024/01/17
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From
Steven M Jones
-
2024/01/17
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From
Douglas Foster
-
2024/01/17
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2024/01/17
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC with multi-valued RFC5322.From
Alessandro Vesely