There were a few errata for the aggregate reporting. I wanted to confirm with the list that these are still valid.
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5440 :: I thought it had been determined the ";" was not necessary. https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6485 :: We've since replaced this, so I don't believe this is relevant. https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5774 :: There were a number of edits for clarification to this portion of the document. The "otherwise specified" language is no longer there, and I believe all concerns have been addressed for this portion. Thanks folks. -- Alex Brotman Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy Comcast _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
