It appears that Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> said: >On Sun 24/Mar/2024 18:06:53 +0100 John Levine wrote: >> It appears that Brotman, Alex <alex_brot...@comcast.com> said: >> >>>https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5774 :: There were a number of edits >>>for clarification to this portion of the document. The "otherwise specified" >language is no >>>longer there, and I believe all concerns have been addressed for this >>>portion. >> >> I think you're right, but checking that schema makes one's eyes glaze. > > >Redundant «minOccurs="1"» certainly don't help the eye. I'm not particularly >happy with them, but can accept that concern for those who don't know what's >the default for minOccurs dictates redundancy.
There's a lot of minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1" which add nothing and if it were up to me, I'd delete. But at this point if we think the XML is correct, let's not mess with it. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc