On Sun 24/Mar/2024 18:06:53 +0100 John Levine wrote:
It appears that Brotman, Alex <alex_brot...@comcast.com> said:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5774 :: There were a number of edits for
clarification to this portion of the document. The "otherwise specified"
language is no
longer there, and I believe all concerns have been addressed for this portion.
I think you're right, but checking that schema makes one's eyes glaze.
Redundant «minOccurs="1"» certainly don't help the eye. I'm not particularly
happy with them, but can accept that concern for those who don't know what's
the default for minOccurs dictates redundancy.
Best
Ale
--
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
